认识抓翻

新佬 发表于 11-6-2 14:10
这……还是在天朝么？难道链接到外文网站了？

朋友喜欢用外文便用外文，你喜欢用中文便用中文，只要有心研究问题，都是无任欢迎的。

As I said this is your assumption, and this is, what's wrong with that?

Well, there is no friction rollover, this is not exist.

Again, this is why you are so famous in the forum.

Keep making your "own" thread then.

I do not think this is a good way to discuss, anyway. Enjoy your own space.

ray9394 发表于 11-6-2 14:34
As I said this is your assumption, and this is, what's wrong with that?

It was your belief that I had this or that as assumption which I had never even mentioned in my posts.  To put it short, I don't have this assumption, clear?

回复 anordinaryman 的帖子

SO what is the action force exerted and what is the reaction force which you mentioned.

回复 ray9394 的帖子

The action force is the uplifting force created by the centipetal force on the CG and the reaction force is the weight of the car toward the ground.  When the action force (uplifting force) exceeds the reaction force (weight), equilibrium is not maintained and the car starts rollover.

They are exerted on the same object? 4th Law?
How about the Weight is bigger than the Uplift? Rollover?
Actually can you show me some articles which say rollover is not related to friction. As what I found are written by layman....

回复 ray9394 的帖子

The article that you dig out in 72# is already a very detailed one not for the layman (even more technical than what I have seen before, especially to the reason for tan(θ)).  What do you expect?

I mean I would expect to see some articles stated that there is no relationship between rollover and friction (traction) from you to support your point of view.  And this is what a meaningful discussion should be.